From previous posts, we have learnt the importance and significance of public spaces within the city. However some of these spaces are failing. Successful public spaces are tricky when it comes to designing. According to William H. Whyte, "It is difficult to design a space that will not attract people - what is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished." Who knows people better than people? Urban architects should not have issues when creating an efficient space, yet somehow they manage to do so. Many public spaces today are designed to be looked at but not touched (Project for Public Spaces). Additionally if a public space is dirty, vandalized or used by the homeless we consider it undesirable. Why this negative stigma?
How do these spaces fail? The PPS has identified a few reasons, some of which are :
1. Lack of spaces to sit/lack of good places to sit. Many public spaces usually do not have sufficient seating areas. This is a major turn off. Who would want to go somewhere where you have to stand during the entire visit? Then there are some that do have seats but they are uncomfortable or vandalized making them undesirable.
Do all public spaces cater to the needs of the public? |
1. Lack of spaces to sit/lack of good places to sit. Many public spaces usually do not have sufficient seating areas. This is a major turn off. Who would want to go somewhere where you have to stand during the entire visit? Then there are some that do have seats but they are uncomfortable or vandalized making them undesirable.
This photo shows a section of Harris Promenade in San Fernando. We see very limited seating space and the seats themselves are dirty and a bit dilapidated. I wouldn't sit there, would you? |
VERY good documentation of failed spaces.
ReplyDelete